( 14 reviews )
-
Posted: Feb 14 2009
This paper is very bad. The printed images have whitespots all through the print, an edge that has to be torn off each print and it takes over a hour to dry. I have had much better prints with Cannon and Kodak paper and will be sticking with them in the future. I can not recommend this paper in any way.
-
( 1 of 1 found this review helpful ) Posted: Mar 3 2008
I just bought 2 packs(200 sheets total). I compared the same EPSON and Canon photo paper pro print with HP one, they are way better than HP Premium Photo Paper. EPSON ultra premium photo and Canon photo paper pro, a bit expensive but print quality are way better. And some people pointed put, perforated edge is something that was never mentioned and I would have never purchased if it was mentioned.
-
Posted: Feb 26 2008
Other brands of photo paper and even the trial suppy provided with my HP printer were 4 X 6 and printed as expected. I didn't realize that my latest purchase of HP photo paper had a perforated tab until I noticed the stack of borderless photos I had just printed were white on the edge. Not the perforated edge! So, I looked into it and discovered that a tab was intended to ease handling of the wet prints. I then inserted the paper with the edge facing out(tear off tab outside the printed area of the paper). But the tear off tab was not presented after printing - it was positioned deep in the output tray where it was inaccesible. After tearing away the perforated tab, several photos retained jagged edges where the tab did not separate cleanly.
